Tag: 阿拉爱上海公主坟琳儿or123

Derivative values: September 2009

first_imgTo access this article REGISTER NOWWould you like print copies, app and digital replica access too? SUBSCRIBE for as little as £5 per week. Would you like to read more?Register for free to finish this article.Sign up now for the following benefits:Four FREE articles of your choice per monthBreaking news, comment and analysis from industry experts as it happensChoose from our portfolio of email newsletterslast_img

‘Training is not enough’: Family lawyers target Tolson over ‘outdated’ views on consent

first_imgLawyers, campaigners and politicians are calling for wider action to be taken after a judge was condemned for employing ‘obsolescent concepts’ on consent in a family case.  Last month the High Court said His Honour Judge Tolson’s judgment following a fact-finding trial in proceedings for child arrangement orders was ‘so flawed as to require a retrial’. The judgment attracted national media coverage.  His Honour Judge Tolson QCSource: Avalon/PhotoshotFamily law specialists have penned an open letter to the lord chancellor, Robert Buckland, and president of the family division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, calling for immediate action to address issues raised in the judgment. The letter is signed by Cris McCurley, a partner at Ben Hoare Bell, Jenny Beck, director of Beck Fitzgerald Lawyers & Consultants, Olive Craig, senior legal officer of campaign group Rights of Women, and Dr Charlotte Proudman, a barrister at Goldsmith Chambers. Last month’s judgment stated that McFarlane will ask the Judicial College to train judges who might hear cases involving serious sexual assault allegations in family proceedings based on training already provided to criminal judges.However, lawyers believe training alone is not enough. The letter says: ‘We are aware that other family judges hold similar “outdated” views. There are wider systemic issues including some lack of understanding of domestic abuse and serious sexual assault, and a failure to apply the practice directions to afford victims a fair trial. This is despite training and clear rules. It leaves children and women at risk of serious harm and undermines the credibility of our legal system. Increasingly, the courts are no longer seen as a safe place for women who have been abused.’Media attention on the case ‘has resulted in women contacting some of the signatories to this letter with their experiences of HHJ Tolson QC and other judges who have expressed similar attitudes… We are concerned that ongoing cases involving domestic abuse and sexual violence are being heard by HHJ Tolson QC. Rights of Women will be raising a formal complaint about the judge to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office’.McFarlane is asked to ‘take steps’ to review Tolson’s ongoing cases where domestic and sexual violence have been raised.Labour MP Louise Haigh, who last year called for an inquiry into the treatment of abuse victims in the family courts, raised the judgment in the Commons chamber today.She said: ‘Justice Tolson is still overseeing cases around domestic abuse and rape in the family court. And just this Monday, despite the [High Court] judgment, he made the same ruling again. Complaints have been made to the Judicial Ombudsman and it is obviously right that this is handled completely independently of this place. But does the leader not agree that this judge should immediately recuse himself from all cases involving domestic abuse?’Commons leader Jacob Rees-Mogg said he was ‘very limited’ on what he could say about individual judges.last_img read more

Firms shut by SRA to appeal interventions

first_imgA high street firm chief plans to appeal the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s decision to shut down his practices. According to intervention notices published on the SRA’s website yesterday, the regulator has decided to close Essex firm Charles Ete & Co Solicitors and Hounslow firm Pride Solicitors Ltd.Charles Ete, a partner at Charles Ete & Co and principal at Pride Solicitors Ltd, told the Gazette he ‘intends to apply to reverse’ the SRA’s notices. He added that he recently acquired Pride Solicitors Ltd.The intervention notice for Pride Solicitors Ltd states that the SRA’s panel was satisfied that grounds for intervention existed, ‘namely that Charles James Ete, as a manager at Pride Solicitors Ltd and Pride Solicitors Ltd had breached the SRA Principles 2011 and the SRA Accounts Rules 2011.’ The notice states there was ‘reason to suspect dishonesty by an employee of Pride Solicitors Ltd, namely Daniel Li Anafi, in connection with that body’s business’.An intervention notice for Ete states that ‘there is reason to suspect dishonesty on the part of Mr Charles Ete in connection with his practice as a solicitor’, and that he failed to comply with SRA principles and accounts rules.Ete’s notice also states that ‘there was reason to suspect dishonesty on the part of an employee of a solicitor, namely an individual known to Charles James Ete as Daniel Li Anafi in connection with Charles James Ete’s practice at Pride Solicitors Ltd’, and that Ete ‘failed to comply with the rules made by virtue of… the Solicitors Act 1974 (as amended)’.The intervention notice for Charles Ete & Co states that ‘there is reason to suspect dishonesty on the part of Mr Charles Ete in connection with his role as a manager’ of the Essex firm, and that the firm, and Ete as a manager, breached SRA principles and accounts rules.According to its website, Charles Ete & Co covers general litigation, and family, divorce, immigration and criminal law. Pride Solicitors specialises in administrative law with ‘particular expertise’ in personal injury, immigration, human rights, family law and commercial conveyancing.last_img read more